Linear A: The Minoan Writing System

 Linear A is considered today one of the most mysterious writing systems of the Bronze Age in the Aegean. It uses symbols to represent syllables and ideograms for objects and concepts, as well as numerical signs. In a very similar way to ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. 

The source of our knowledge about this system primarily comes from clay tablets found at various archaeological sites over time in many regions of Crete, such as Hagia Triada, Knossos, Phaistos, and Chania. 

Its name was coined by sir Arthur Evans, who distinguished its symbols as Linear-meaning lines drawn onto the clay-in contrast to the more pictorial Cretan Hieroglyphs.

Why does Linear A Remain a Mystery?

Two primary reasons prevent us from deciphering this ancient writing system. 

1. The language it records, Minoan, is completely unknown. It does not appear to be related to any known language, such as ancient Greek, Egyptian, or Semitic.Regarding Linear B, which researchers eventually managed to decipher after discovering that it was essentially an early form of Greek (Mycenaean), attempts to assign the phonetic values of Linear B's symbols to those of Linear A have failed.
2. The second reason is the limited number of inscriptions available to us. In contrast to Linear B, where there are thousands of clay tablets, we only have a small, fragmentary collection in Linear A-approximately 1,500 inscriptions. Most of these appear to have economic content. Consequently, even if we could fully read them, we would not be able to gather information about Minoan religious practices, political offices, and many other topics. Due to the primarily accounting nature, we also lack sufficient vocabulary, and they do not offer adequate material for a grammatical and syntactical analysis. This likely happened because the Minoan used perishable materials for their important texts, such as parchment or papyrus, or even clay, which they recycled after each use. The clay tablets that have been found were preserved only because they were burned, not intentionally, but by fires during the destruction of the palaces, thus hardening the clay.

It should be noted here that despite all these difficulties, researchers have confidently managed to decipher many parts of this system.

Symbols and Structure of Linear A

Based on the tablets we have available, we see that it consists of three categories of symbols: Syllabograms (Syllabic signs) Ideograms (Logograms) Numerals (Numerical Signs). 

Syllabograms are simple lines formed in the clay that correspond to sounds. Each sign represents a syllable: a consonant-vowel combination (e.g. KU, MA, RE) or simply a vowel (e.g. A, E, I, O, U). Between 70 and 90 different syllabograms have been recorded-a typical number for such a system. Many of them visually resemble the corresponding signs of Linear B. Thus, it is hypothesised that they share the same value or meaning in Linear A. 

 Ideograms. A direct representation of a word. They resemble the objects they represent, such as animals or people or goods.

Numerical Signs. A well-understood decimal system. A vertical line (|) represents the one. A horizontal line (-) represents ten. A circle (0) represents one hundred. A circle with spokes that resembles a sun represents one thousand. 

The certainty of researchers that these are numerical symbols is based on comparative records from the surviving tablets. The most important reason is the way they appear, as they are always written after an ideogram. The second reason is their multiple repetitions. These symbols are frequently repeated in groups (e.g. five vertical lines together), but they never exceed nine because, thereafter, the horizontal lines always appear. These, in turn, never exceed nine, because for the symbol of one hundred the circle appears. Therefore, since they appear in lists of goods and their summation has an accounting meaning, the interpretation that they are numbers is the only one that explains the overall structure of the texts. 

Limitation of The Clay Tablets

It must be emphasised at this point that some names corresponding to deities worshipped by the ancient Minoans are known today, but this information is not confirmed by Linear A. The first reason, as written above, is that the clay tablets are not religious texts. The only evidence for the ancient religion comes from archaeological finds, such as sanctuaries on high peaks, surviving altars, and other items. Specific names of deities are known today because they were mentioned in later written sources, during the period when ancient Greek civilisation prevailed in Crete. 

More specifically, the name Britomartis has been discussed by authors such as Strabo, Pausanias, and Callimachus. The name Velchanos is presented in later traditions as a god of vegetation who was later identified with Zeus. Eileithya is mentioned in the Homeric epics as the goddess or goddesses (plural) of childbirth and also is recognised on Linear B tablets. 

In conclusion, we therefore know these names are Cretan due to the entirety of the historical tradition and the local cult that was preserved on the island for centuries. However, whether these names existed in the era of Linear A and in their original Minoan form remains unknown. 

Prospects for Deciphering Linear A

Research progress and the potential for deciphering Linear A provide hope for this achievement. 

Perhaps at some point, for example, a stone or tablet equivalent to the Rosetta Stone will be found. The discovery of a bilingual or trilingual inscription would have to contain the exact same text in Linear A and in some known ancient language, such as Ancient Egyptian or Ancient Greek. With such a discovery, researchers would be able to match words, phrases, and names.

The second way would be the discovery of new, long-form texts, so there would be enough material for the correlation of symbols and word patterns.

Furthermore, with the rise o technology and rapid developments, many researchers are utilising new computational tools like artificial intelligence to study the structure and roots of words and grammatical patterns in ways that were not possible in the past. These tools could reveal correlations in ways that the human mind is unable to identify which could lead us to a successful approach and perhaps shed light on the mysteries of these ancient people with this strange and forgotten language. 

Author: Theocharis George Paterakis 

References:

          Wikipedia contributors. (2025, December 16). Linear A. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_A

           Linear A script. (n.d.). https://www.omniglot.com/writing/lineara.htm

           Hirst, K. K. (2018, June 6). Linear A: Early Cretan Writing System. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/linear-writing-system-of-the-minoans-171553

           Sci.News. (2021, February 8). Scientists one step closer to cracking Minoan Linear a script. Sci.News: Breaking Science News. https://www.sci.news/archaeology/minoan-linear-a-script-09329.html

           Fsanchez. (2023, February 12). Decoding Linear A, the writing system of the ancient Minoans. Hellenic Studies. https://hellenicstudies.gsu.edu/2023/02/12/decoding-linear-a-the-writing-system-of-the-ancient-minoans-2/

           Archaeology Newsroom. (2020, September 9). The mathematical values of Linear A fraction signs. Archaeology Wiki. https://www.archaeology.wiki/blog/2020/09/09/the-mathematical-values-of-linear-a-fraction-signs/

            Zeke, A. (n.d.). Exploring the Cretan numeral system. http://minoablog.blogspot.com/2012/04/exploring-cretan-numeral-system.html

Writing Tools (Not Affiliate Links)

Quilbot for grammatical check and citation creation.

Writersonic for translation and building of this article. It also used the Gemini of Google.